#IS WINDOWS POWERSHELL THE SAME AS COMMAND PROMPT WINDOWS#
It is generally compatible, but provides extensions which address some of the limitations of COMMAND.COM (above explanations are referred by Wikipedia).Īpparently lots of people don't realise that the DOS Prompt, and the Windows Command Prompt are not the same thing. In reality, cmd.exe is a Windows program that acts as a DOS-like command line interpreter. (COMMAND.COM uses temporary files, and runs the two sides serially, one after the other.) As a result, it is possible to redirect the standard error in cmd.exe, unlike COMMAND.COM. This allows it to take advantage of features available to native programs on the platform that are otherwise unavailable to DOS programs.įor example, since cmd.exe is a native text-mode application on OS/2, it can use real pipes in command pipelines, allowing both sides of the pipeline to run concurrently. cmd.exe is a native Windows application usually running in a Win32 console.
Command Prompt is a Windows program that emulates many of the command line abilities available in MS-DOS but it is not actually MS-DOS.Ĭommand Prompt is a GUI version of in MS-DOS. The command prompt is a non-graphical interface that allows you to interact with your operating system.Ĭommand Prompt is a command line interpreter application available in most Windows operating systems, officially called the Windows Command Processor but sometimes called the command shell. In the vast majority of cases they don't actually know what they're referring to.įrom what I understand, MS-DOS is the disk operating system that Microsoft released. Inside, I actually cringe each time I see people referring to a window with gray-on-black text as MS-DOS.
In any case, even was just a shell for DOS. DOS only lives on there in ntvdm.exe which is the NT Virtual DOS Machine which is just a thin emulation layer capturing calls that the CPU cannot execute directly (which is why it works faster but worse than DOSBox). But on Windows NT, 2000, XP, Vista and 7 – no. There you had an entire virtual machine running DOS. Things were different in Windows 95, 98 and ME where would be run in a MS-DOS VM with Windows acting as the hypervisor (yes, they had that sort of thing at the time already). Also, is a 16-bit program while cmd.exe is a native Windows console application.
Its built-in commands and scripting syntax (including many quirks) are based on the ancient from CP/M and later MS-DOS, but apart from that they are completely separate things.
What is run when you click Command Prompt in the Start Menu is the Windows Command Processor, a.k.a. (Unless your definition of equality does not extend past »*It is a text interface and I can run programs from it.*« ) So no, in every Windows from the NT family (e.g., XP, Vista, 7, 8), the command prompt and MS-DOS are visually similar, but quite different. One can not run Win32 applications in the loader system in the manner that OS/2, UNIX or Consumer Windows can launch character mode sessions. The command line accessed the DOS command line (usually ), through a Windows module (winoldap.mod).Ī new line of Windows, (Windows NT), boot through a kernel whose sole purpose is to load Windows. With Windows 95, 98, and ME the MS-DOS part was integrated, treating both operating systems as a complete package. The user interface, and the icon up to Windows 2000, followed the native MS-DOS interface.Ĭonsumer Windows (up to 3.11, Win9x, WinME) ran as a Graphical User Interface (GUI) running on top of MS-DOS. This could run many DOS and variously Win32, OS/2 1.x and Posix command line utilities in the same command-line session, allowing piping between commands. This was true once, but it isn't anymore.įrom MS-DOS # Windows command-line interface - Wikipedia:Īll versions of Microsoft Windows have had an MS-DOS like command-line interface (CLI).
0 kommentar(er)
